Legislature(2007 - 2008)HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/05/2008 12:00 PM House FINANCE
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
SB196 | |
HB337 | |
SB229 | |
SJR17 | |
SB185 | |
SB265 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ | HB 337 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | SB 185 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | SB 229 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | SB 265 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | SJR 17 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
+= | SB 196 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE BILL NO. 337 "An Act establishing the Alaska Health Care Commission and the Alaska health care information office; relating to health care planning and information; repealing the certificate of need program for certain health care facilities and relating to the repeal; annulling certain regulations required for implementation of the certificate of need program for certain health care facilities; and providing for an effective date." 1:44:32 PM KARLEEN JACKSON, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES presented an overview of the bill. She indicated this was the Governor's Health Care Transparency Act crafted after a year's work with input from two different reports, the Governor's Health Care Planning Strategy Council and the Certificate of Need Task Force. The intent of bill was to have three components that worked together to improve Alaska Health Care. She indicated the three components of the bill to achieve this goal were to: 1. Create a Health Commission charged with making sure Alaska has a state-wide plan responsive to changing demographics and Market conditions to guide public and private investments in the health care service system. Begin policy discussion about tough issues like end of life care. 2. Promote self-responsibility by giving Alaskans new tools to take charge of their health and health care options through a web-based information source that makes clear the cost, availability, and quality of those options. 3. Encourage healthy competition among providers of health care so that consumer choice rather than government and court intervention determines the cost, availability and quality of health care by eliminating Certificate of Need program. The original bill had seven hearings in the House Health and Social Services committee that resulted in the current version of the bill. Ms. Jackson presented a sectional analysis of HB 337, Version N (copy on file). Section 1 Provides for Legislative findings and intent to mandate an evaluation of the state's health care needs, propose reforms, and improve health care in Alaska by establishing the Alaska Health Care Commission for the purpose of developing a comprehensive policy that better meets the current and long-range health care needs in the state. Sec. 2 AS 18.05.010(b) Requires the Department of Health and Social Services to implement a statewide health plan under AS 18.09, which is a new chapter creating the Alaska Health Care Commission. Sec. 3 AS 18.07.031(e) Amends definition of "expenditure" under the Certificate of Need program. Sec. 4 AS 18.07.111(8) Under the Certificate of Need program, applies the definition of "health care facility," if the hospital facility or center is located in a municipality or borough that has a critical access hospital or that has a population of 60,000 or fewer persons (excluding recipients of military or Indian Health Service health care); and nursing homes, residential psychiatric treatment centers; excludes Alaska Pioneers Homes, offices of private physicians or dentists, and military and tribal health entities. Sec. 5 AS 18.07.111 Amends definitions of facilities in which Certificate of Need applies, including: ambulatory surgical facility, critical access hospital, independent diagnostic testing facility, intermediate care facility, kidney dialysis center, nursing home, office of private physicians (50 percent owned and operated by physicians), and psychiatric hospital. Sec. 6 AS 18 Adds new Chapter 9, Statewide Health Information Office; Article 1. Sec. 18.09.100 Establishes an Alaska Health Care Information Office in the Department of Health and Social Services to provide consistently updated health care facility information to aid consumers of health care services, and information to encourage personal responsibility in prevention and healthy living. Sec. 18.09.110 Requires the department to establish and maintain a database on an Internet website about health care facilities services and cost. Information in the data base includes health care facility information; health care providers licensed in Alaska; a list of not more than 1500 commonly prescribed medications in the state and the cost; a list of not more than 250 most commonly conducted medical procedures in the state and the cost; hospital ratings; consumer education information on health, insurance information, clinics that cater to uninsured and self-pay patients; and quality of health care facilities; and information regarding prevention and healthy living. Sec. 18.09.120 Requires health care facilities to provide the department information related to the facility's health care services for placement on the database developed under AS 18.09.110. Sec. 18.09.130 The Department of Administration, the Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development, and the Department of Labor and Workforce Development, and the Department of Law shall provide information for placement on the database regarding adverse actions taken against a health care facility or against licensed professionals practicing in health care facilities in the state and cooperate with the department in performance of its duties under AS 18.09.100-18.09.130. Article 2 Sec. 18.09.900 Allows the Department of Health and Social Services to adopt regulations under AS 44.62 to carry out purposes of this chapter. Sec. 18.09.990 Provides definitions of facilities from which the department would collect information. 1:50:43 PM Sec. 7 Establishes a 16-member Alaska Health Care Commission within the Department of Health and Social Services. The purpose of the Commission is to consider the spectrum of health care related issues and formulate policy recommendations to be presented to the legislature and executive branch; to develop a statewide plan to address the quality, accessibility and affordability of health care for all citizens of the state; to provide an annual report to the legislature that includes a comprehensive list of policy options considered by the commission; and to review and approve facility health care information for placement on the department's Internet database established under AS 18.09.110. Section 2 Specifies that the plan contain a health care policy and a strategy for encouraging: personal responsibility and reductions in health care costs; access to safe water and wastewater systems; development of a sustainable health care workforce; accessible quality health care; and an increase in the number of residents who are covered by insurance. Ms. Blaisdell described that the membership of the commission includes: 1. The department medical director (chair) 2. A representative of the Mental Health Trust Authority, appointed by the authority 3. A representative of the University of Alaska health education and training programs appointed, by the university 4. Seven public members including: a. one member representing the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium appointed by the consortium b. one member representing the Alaska Primary Care Association, appointed by the association c. one member representing the Alaska State Nurses Association, appointed by the association d. one member representing the health insurance industry appointed by the governor e. two health care consumers or advocates appointed by the governor, one of whom will be a small business owner in the state f. six members of the legislature, three appointed by the president of the senate and three appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives. Ms. Blaisdell remarked that the terms of office are staggered terms of three years. She noted that the commission shall employ an executive director who is not a member of the commission. She stressed that the Health Care Commission will sunset on June 30, 2014. Sec. 8 Directs the commissioner of the Department of Health and Social Services and Department of Law to immediately take steps to seek dismissal of pending administrative appeals and court actions concerning the issuance of certificates of need, as appropriate, under AS 18.07, as amended. Sec. 9 Allows the Department of Health and Social Services to adopt regulations that are necessary to implement changes made by this Act. Sec. 10 Provides for the department of contract with an entity to conduct a comprehensive study of the effects of the certificate of need program in the state, and provide a copy of the study to the legislature. Sec. 11 Section 9 takes effect immediately (for the development of regulations). Sec. 12 Except as provided in sec. 11, the Act takes effect July 1, 2008. 1:53:34 PM Ms. Jackson summarized that the bill would put together a health commission and an outline for an information office to move Alaskans toward a better health care system. However, as originally crafted, the Governor's Health Care Transparency Act repeals the CON program moving Alaska to full competition in the health care market and away from thirty years of a government controlled and, most recently, court-determined health care delivery system that is one of the most expensive and least accessible in the country. 1:54:57 PM Co-Chair Meyer questioned why the Commission would sunset. Ms. Jackson agreed this was a good question and admitted to being happier if it was not there. 1:55:48PM Representative Gara asked what prevents this Commission from studying things but not implementing anything. He noted that the Governor appointed a Commission last year that recommended changes to the Denali KidCare program to two hundred percent eligibility but a bill never came from the Governor's Office. Ms. Jackson responded that the first task force was time limited. The task force looked at the long and short term strategies that could be developed but did not have time to put fiscal notes to the policies. One of the recommendations included an ongoing Commission to provide an annual report with policy recommendations to the Legislature and the Governor. The difference with this Commission would be the deliverance of a report every year. 1:57:32 PM Representative Gara noted that the Commission proposal on Denali KidCare at two hundred percent was known but never acted upon. Ms. Jackson responded that there were many issues to deal with in regard to health reform. The health care commission insures that all the different strategies and goals have timelines and a possibility of being implemented over time. Representative Gara disagreed and thought Denali KidCare, with a known fiscal note, should not wait from another report from another Commission. He referred to the Commission composition as being heavy in group representation but little representation from the consumers affected. Ms. Jackson responded that the original legislation did not have the specific seats but was the evolution of seven meetings. She believed this to be a balance of all suggestions. She shared his concerns to make sure consumers were involved but suggested that any work by the Commission would include public testimony. 2:01:14 PM Representative Gara requested to see the alternative proposals for the board. He believed the suggested board would not be reflective of the vast majority of people without health insurance. 2:01:50 PM Ms. Jackson pointed out that the Alaska Primary Care Association does work toward trying to make sure that the uninsured have insurance. 2:02:18 PM ROD BETIT, PRESIDENT, ALASKA HOSPITAL AND NURSING HOME ASSOCIATION supported the legislation with some reservations. The Association supported Sections 1 and 2 which they believed would improve the functioning of the department. The Association opposed Section 3 and believed the current language is recommended over the new proposed language. 2:05:46 PM Mr. Betit signified concern in Section 4 in that it redefined the definition of a health care facility. The bill states this is a way to increase competition and decrease costs but the Association believed this would have the exact opposite effect. He stated the repeal of the CON would be detrimental to Alaska consumers. A 2001 study by Chrysler, Ford and General Motors examined health care costs over several years in eight states and found that costs were eleven to thirty-nine percent lower in states with CON requirements than in those without it. The amount of bad debt increased fifty five percent in Alaska hospitals between 2006 and 2007. Mr. Betit stressed that the repeal of CON would reduce hospitals revenue from more profitable service areas used to offset part of growing bad debt problem. 2:07:59 PM Mr. Betit referred to Section 5 and the proposed new definitions. Definition #13 deals with Independent Diagnostic Testing Facility versus a physician practice with imagining equipment. He believed Definition #13 should be replaced with language from HB 345 that clarifies when imaging equipment purchased for a physician's office is exempt from CON review. He speculated that this added language would eliminate eighty percent of the lawsuits and appeals currently before the state on imaging CON decisions. He believed Definition #17 should be entirely deleted as there is no useful purpose for attempting to define what is or is not a physician office. Physician offices have always been exempt from CON in Alaska and this proposed definition would simply create interpretive complexity to an area that is already very clear. Mr. Betit observed Section 6 deals with the Health Care Information Office and mandatory reporting. The Association strongly supports efforts to provide consumers with better information to guide their health care purchases with a few additional language clarification amendments. 2:11:29 PM Mr. Betit referred to Section 7 that establishes the Health Care Commission and remarked the Association strongly supports this commission but strongly recommends amending it to give the Commission authority to define the reporting requirements for each health care category. The Commission is the more appropriate body for determining what is most useful to consumers in weighing health care decisions that must be made. 2:12:49 PM Mr. Betit discussed the importance of the sunset for the Commission. He remarked the Commission needs to be monitored to see if it is fulfilling its purpose. If the Commission is not fulfilling its purpose, it would go away. The Association does not support Sections 8 and 9. He noted Section 10 strongly supports competition of an Alaska specific CON study to address the question of what impact a CON repeal would have in Alaska. The Association does not support any repeal of CON and therefore believed this diction should be deleted. In Section 11, which deals with a mandatory reporting date, the Association believes it is unrealistic to expect for receiving and posting reported information prior to July 1, 2009. 2:14:21 PM Representative Gara inquired if the Committee decided to pass part of this bill and passed the consumer information sections 6 and 7 would the Association support this. Mr. Betit said yes. 2:14:49 PM PAUL MORRIS, CFO, ALASKA REGIONAL HOSPITAL supported this legislation as a great first step in Alaska Health care. An independent study is needed to evaluate where the state is going, the language used, and how it will affect the consumer. He listed several pro and CON studies and overwhelmingly each group decided to retain the CON. He also referenced the definition of physician practice. 2:18:20 PM Representative Gara inquired if Mr. Morris would support the bill if two sections, the Health Information Section and the Planning Commission were passed and then a study was initiated on the CON. Mr. Morris agreed. He agreed that all three components are good but more detailed data collection on the CON was needed. Representative Gara requested where the CON study was in the bill. Representative Hawker replied it was in Section 10. 2:20:00 PM Mr. Morris referred to the extensive study in the state of Maine that indicated the CON should be retained. Representative Gara agreed but was troubled by each group wanting their view to be represented but he believed the greater importance was what is best for the state. A study could provide an independent judgment on the best decision. 2:21:06 PM Mr. Morris agreed with Representative Gara that a study was needed and if one was not done, then the problem would keep reoccurring and the debate would continue. 2:21:42 PM PAUL FUHS, ALASKA OPEN IMAGING CENTER, remarked that all agree on defining an individual independent diagnostic testing facility and physician's office. The result of not having a good definition is having nine lawsuits filed. In order to come under the $1 million threshold, people are turning to old technology and equipment. He believed the Medicare services guidelines should be followed that do not require any percentage of ownership. He noted the fifty percent number was added because people did not want a store front taking imagining with no doctor on premises. 2:24:51 PM Mr. Fuhs continued that data collection is important for people to be able to make informed choices, otherwise medical expenses are being driven up. 2:25:29 PM JOEL GILBERTSON, REGIONAL DIRECTOR, STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT AND ADMINISTRATION, PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL (testified via teleconference), shared that healthcare is becoming more unaffordable throughout the nation and the state. He believed a clear first step would be the creation of a Commission. He agreed that more information is needed to represent the consumers for recommendations in health care reform. The information needs to be relevant and accurate to make better decisions. Health care costs are driven by what is ordered and charged by physicians and facilities. 2:29:24 PM Mr. Gilbertson signified that Providence does not support the proposed language to repeal the Certificate of Need in communities over 60,000. He believed this eliminates public participation and input in health care planning and infrastructure in the communities. There is research for and against the CON. The Task Force agreed that the CON is a relevant public policy tool that needs to be preserved. He supported a study to be completed on the CON. Representative Gara asked if that if there was an agreement on how to rewrite the CON law would he support a bill that passed out with the Health Care Office, the Commission, and the CON study. Mr. Gilbertson agreed that with some minor amendments they would support the legislation. Representative Gara remarked that the Commission would address the availability of medical care. He contended that one of the big indicators for keeping a doctor in state is whether they can attend a residency program in this state. He noted that Mr. Gilbertson has a family practice residency that may be expanding. Representative Gara inquired how many people annually come out of this practice and if it was the only one in the state. 2:32:54 PM Mr. Gilbertson answered that there was only one residency program in Alaska. It is a three-year program with eight residents and is subsidized by Providence. Providence has prioritized growing the program; the current first-year class has 12 residents. National studies show that one of the leading determinants of where a physician will practice is where they did their residency. However, the residency program loses money. It is a working clinic for uninsured and Medicaid/Medicare patients, and is subsidized by the hospital at $2 million per year. Representative Gara offered to work with Mr. Gilbertson on the subject. Vice-Chair Stoltze stated concerns. 2:35:44 PM ROBERT CIMASI, PRESIDENT, HEALTH CAPITAL CONSULTANTS, MISSOURI (testified via teleconference), spoke in support of HB 337. He summarized his written report to the Committee ("Alaska Health, Education and Social Services Committee, Testimony on Certificate of Need," Copy on File). Mr. Cimasi referred to the many studies done on CON programs and cautioned the Committee to read them carefully as they each address different issues. Mr. Cimasi thought that health care should be about providing care to patients and their families. He addressed cross subsidization as a "hidden tax." Hospitals provide a broad range of services. Those with CON raise prices. Costs go up on the promise that there will be cross subsidization of other services. He referred the Committee to a Health Affairs article by Clark Havighurst, who states that health insurance greatly increases the profitability of monopoly. If costs are allowed to be raised and there is no commitment against cross subsidization, the result is higher costs with no benefit to anyone. Mr. Cimasi referred to an extensive study by the Federal Trade Commission, "Hospital Competition and Charity Care," which states there is a lack of statistical evidence for the cross subsidization hypothesis. Other studies support that. He asked the Committee to focus on the consumer and the patient. CON regulation is favorable to hospitals, not consumers. 2:47:12 PM NANCY CROSS, PHYSICIAN, FAIRBANKS (testified via teleconference), spoke in support of HB 337. She has not been able to secure privileges at the local hospital. She cannot do hospital based procedures, but must take patients to Anchorage, which limits patients who cannot afford to travel. She described the long process of applying, inquiring and being given privileges and having them taken away. 2:51:46 PM DR. LARRY STINSON, ANCHORAGE (testified via teleconference), spoke in favor of the bill. He thought it had been demonstrated to be effective other places. In current literature CON hasn't been shown to be of benefit, but drives up costs. The state program has been in place since 1986. Each year the study is delayed it hurts the patient. He is wary of a study if it does not represent the consumer. Hospitals in other states without CON still make profits. 2:55:33 PM GRANT RODERER, PHYSICIAN, ANCHORAGE (testified via teleconference), asked the Committee to repeal the CON. He would like the population limit lowered. JOANNE SMITH, WASILLA (testified via teleconference), spoke in favor of the bill. The current CON regulations are outdated and should be repealed. The population base should be eliminated. Alaska has the highest price and lowest quality in health care, and a shortage of physicians. CON was repealed on the federal level over twenty years ago because it did not work. Competition is a good thing in health care. She thought more physicians would come to Alaska after CON was repealed. 3:01:57 PM RICHARD COBDEN, PHYSICIAN, FAIRBANKS (testified via teleconference), spoke in support the legislation with some reservations, including eliminating MatSu, Anchorage and Fairbanks from the process. He agrees that CON increases costs without increasing care. There has been no consumer input on the Commission. He thought legislators have the responsibility to tax but are abrogating that to hospitals. He wanted to address the problems of health care directly. 3:06:30 PM KEVIN DOREY, FAIRBANKS (testified via teleconference), spoke in support of the bill as a consumer and economist. The CON law as applied in Alaska is a violation of federal anti- trust law. He thought there would be more opportunity to move forward if the State did not wait until the federal government removed CON. He did not think Fairbanks was a rural community and did not need the protections of the CON system. When individuals have applied for CON, they have been saddled with endless lawsuits. MIKE POWERS, CEO, FAIRBANKS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL (testified via teleconference), opposed all sections in the legislation that support CON. He listed his thoughts on each of the sections. He spoke to the other testifiers who had issues with the Fairbanks hospital. 3:15:12 PM JILL THORVALD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, MEDICAL FACILITY, FAIRBANKS (testified via teleconference), gave her perspective as an operator in a private facility. She supports the Governor's bill on CON. Physicians will view Alaska as more attractive without CON. More specialties will keep money in Fairbanks instead of patients traveling outside Alaska and to Anchorage. She thought Medicare is an entirely different issue that needs to be dealt with separately. She did not see the bill as an anti-hospital bill. 3:19:36 PM STEPHEN SUTLEY, FAIRBANKS (testified via teleconference), spoke in support the legislation, although he considers it a poor compromise as populations are not well defined. The health care issue is major in the national elections, and thought it should be an issue in the state elections. Well documented studies from many organizations show that the CON does not work as it stifles free market enterprise, consumer choice, and physician recruitment. Fairbanks is among the fastest growing cities in the nation, yet it lacks physicians. 3:25:06 PM SCOTT BELL, FAIRBANKS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION BOARD (testified via teleconference), supported many parts of the bill, but was very opposed to Sec. 4 which would have a strong negative impact on the quality of health care available. He spoke to an award the hospital had gotten recognizing its commitment to community health. He felt CON is important in providing high quality health care. He highlighted a wide range of services at the Fairbanks hospital. 3:28:22 PM MAREE BARNEY-SUTLEY, FAIRBANKS (testified via teleconference), spoke as a consumer and senior in support of eliminating CON. She urged the Committee to move the bill through. RYAN SMITH, CEO, HOSPITAL, SOLDOTNA (testified via teleconference), supported the study but not the elimination of CON. The hospital does not have a parent company outside of Alaska. He thought the regulation committee had been poorly represented. The group voted against CON being removed. 3:31:10 PM ROMAN STEVENS, CEO, MAT-SU MEDICAL CENTER, FAIRBANKS (testified via teleconference), said the committee was balanced and thought it was misrepresented. He wanted to maintain the CON and protect community hospitals. He was supportive of the study. MIKE MCNAMARA, SURGEON, ANCHORAGE (testified via teleconference), spoke in opposition of the bill. He agreed with the need for further information on CON, and with the plan to create a Commission. Regarding CON, none of Anchorage centers are full capacity. The have become very specialized and rarely have to send people outside of Alaska. He thought more centers would dilute that care and worried about losing peer oversight of big centers. There is a shortage of nursing in all centers. If CON is repealed, then centers will be competing for specialty nursing staff and physicians. The larger centers have the power to negotiate contracts with insurance companies and unions, which brings costs down. 3:36:56 PM MARK WADE, SURGEON, FAIRBANKS (testified via teleconference), spoke in support of the legislation. He told his experience with CON. He had been given one to open a center, but could not build the center as he has lawsuits against him. He believes that freedom of choice is best for the people of Alaska. He resigned from the committee, where citizens were not represented. He wanted a free market. 3:42:14 PM MURRAY RICHMOND, CHAPLAIN, FAIRBANKS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL (testified via teleconference), spoke in opposition to the legislation. He spoke to the variety of excellent services in Fairbanks and thought the system was working for the consumer. He did not want health care to be subject to the forces of the market. CARONE STURM, FAIRBANKS (testified via teleconference), spoke as a consumer in Fairbanks in support of HB 337. She wants the CON repealed. She has a child with a serious health concern and said the costs are very high. 3:46:31 PM MIKE MADDOX, FAIRBANKS (testified via teleconference), spoke in support of the bill. Fairbanks is the only community in the country of its size with one hospital. He spoke to decreased service to the community. Fairbanks has only one image center. Costs in some cases are doubled (testimony garbled due to technical difficulties). 3:50:44 PM JENNINE HINMAN, HEALTH CARE CONSULTANT, ADVANCED MEDICAL CENTERS OF ALASKA, WASILLA (testified via teleconference), spoke in favor of the bill. Instead of getting another task force, she suggested repealing the CON and providing for a review of that in five years. She spoke to the future need for care for disabled veterans from Iraq. PUBLIC TESTIMONY CLOSED. HB 337 was HEARD and HELD in Committee for further consideration. RECESS 3:56:17 PM RECONVENE 7:23:52 PM
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|